Compare AI models: Grok 4.7 vs GLM-5.1

Grok 4.7xAIHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
GLM-5.1ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Grok 4.7	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	71/100	26/100	75/100	50/100	50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark
GLM-5.1	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	88/100	34/100	46/100	0/100	45/100

Overview

Author

xAI

Zhipu

Context length

500K

200K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Pdf

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

xAI

Zhipu

Pricing

Input

$2.00/ 1M

$0.90/ 1M

Output

$6.00/ 1M

$3.59/ 1M

Cached input

$0.50/ 1M

$0.19/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

56K

38K

Completed sessions

136,163

102,120

Token share

0.01%

Tokens

71B+100%

54B-80%

SEP 3OCT 28

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

42.9%1.6K user-weeks

51.1%1.4K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeGrok 4.7 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGrok 4.7Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeGLM-5.1 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5.1Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonGrok 4.7 vs Jamba MiniGrok 4.7Jamba Mini Related comparisonGLM-5.1 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5.1Jamba Mini