CompareAI models
- Hy3Tencent
- MiMo-V2.5Xiaomi
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hy3 | 100/100 | 69/100 | 82/100 | 54/100 | 0/100 | No data |
| MiMo-V2.5 | 100/100 | No data | 81/100 | 93/100 | 67/100 | No data |
Overview
Author
Context length
256K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text
Text, Image, Audio, Video
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.08/ 1M
$0.14/ 1M
Output
$0.33/ 1M
$0.28/ 1M
Cached input
$0.02/ 1M
$0.003/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
316K
1.1M
Completed sessions
5,495,886
13,972,091
Token share
1.47%
7.36%
Tokens
6.5T+100%
33T+219%
JUL 5AUG 29
JUL 5AUG 29
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
60.5%839 user-weeks
69.6%15K user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITHy3·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITNearby alternativeMiMo-V2.5 vs Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITMiMo-V2.5·Gemma-SEA-LION-v4-27B-ITRelated comparisonHy3 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextHy3·Qwen3.8 Flash NextRelated comparisonMiMo-V2.5 vs Qwen3.8 Flash NextMiMo-V2.5·Qwen3.8 Flash Next