Compare AI models: Kimi K2.6 vs Hy3

Kimi K2.6MoonshotHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
Hy3Tencent

ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use

Normalized model capability scores
Model	Reasoning	Coding	Cost efficiency	Context window	Multimodal	Tool use
Kimi K2.6	50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark	78/100	35/100	63/100	50/100	27/100
Hy3	67/100	68/100	70/100	53/100	0/100	40/100

Overview

Author

Moonshot

Tencent

Context length

262K

256K

Reasoning

True

Input modalities

Text, Image, Video

Text

Output modalities

Text

Providers

Moonshot

Tencent

Pricing

Input

$0.75/ 1M

$0.13/ 1M

Output

$3.50/ 1M

$0.53/ 1M

Cached input

$0.15/ 1M

$0.03/ 1M

MomentumLast 2 mo

Unique users

70K

68K

Completed sessions

238,676

480,437

Token share

0.01%

0.02%

Tokens

117B-81%

252B-96%

SEP 3OCT 28

RetentionWeek 1

Returning users

56.6%2.7K user-weeks

63.9%1.9K user-weeks

Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.

Nearby alternativeKimi K2.6 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructKimi K2.6Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Nearby alternativeHy3 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructHy3Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instruct Related comparisonKimi K2.6 vs Jamba MiniKimi K2.6Jamba Mini Related comparisonHy3 vs Jamba MiniHy3Jamba Mini