Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-5
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-5ZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 56/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GLM-5 | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 34/100 | 40/100 | 50/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
205K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.30/ 1M
$0.60/ 1M
Output
$1.20/ 1M
$2.69/ 1M
Cached input
$0.006/ 1M
$0.15/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.9M
11K
Completed sessions
103,917,656
35,282
Token share
37.6%
0%
Tokens
448T+100%
3.8B-91%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
55.7%131 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-5 vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-5·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-5 vs Jamba MiniGLM-5·Jamba Mini