Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs GLM-4.7-Flash
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- GLM-4.7-FlashZhipuHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 51/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| GLM-4.7-Flash | 50/100 — Reasoning supported; no comparable benchmark | 5/100 | 100/100 | 46/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
200K
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.50/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Output
$1.50/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
Cached input
$0.13/ 1M
$0.00/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.9M
0
Completed sessions
103,917,656
0
Token share
37.6%
0%
Tokens
448T+100%
00%
SEP 3OCT 28
No trend data
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeGLM-4.7-Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructGLM-4.7-Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonGLM-4.7-Flash vs Jamba MiniGLM-4.7-Flash·Jamba Mini