Compare AI models: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs exo
- DeepSeek V4.1 FlashDeepSeek
- exoHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DeepSeek V4.1 Flash | 100/100 | 100/100 | 51/100 | 81/100 | 33/100 | 92/100 |
| exo | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder | 50/100 — No data; neutral placeholder |
Overview
Author
Context length
1M
Unknown
Reasoning
True
Unknown
Input modalities
Text, Image
Unknown
Output modalities
Text
Unknown
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.50/ 1M
Unknown
Output
$1.50/ 1M
Unknown
Cached input
$0.13/ 1M
Unknown
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
3.9M
12K
Completed sessions
103,917,656
279,398
Token share
37.6%
0.01%
Tokens
448T+100%
115B+100%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
69.2%413K user-weeks
Pending
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeexo vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B Instructexo·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonDeepSeek V4.1 Flash vs Jamba MiniDeepSeek V4.1 Flash·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonexo vs Jamba Miniexo·Jamba Mini