Compare AI models: Qwen3.8 Flash Next vs Qwen3.7 Max
- Qwen3.8 Flash NextAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
- Qwen3.7 MaxAlibabaHollow points use fallbacks · hover for details
ReasoningCodingCost efficiencyContext windowMultimodalTool use
| Model | Reasoning | Coding | Cost efficiency | Context window | Multimodal | Tool use |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Qwen3.8 Flash Next | 100/100 | 100/100 | 81/100 | 63/100 | 50/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
| Qwen3.7 Max | 59/100 | 91/100 | 21/100 | 81/100 | 0/100 | 50/100 — Tool calling supported; no comparable benchmark |
Overview
Author
Context length
262K
1M
Reasoning
True
True
Input modalities
Text, Image, Video
Text
Output modalities
Text
Text
Providers
Pricing
Input
$0.10/ 1M
$2.50/ 1M
Output
$0.20/ 1M
$7.50/ 1M
Cached input
Unknown
$0.50/ 1M
MomentumLast 2 mo
Unique users
2
36K
Completed sessions
2
85,715
Token share
0%
0%
Tokens
13M+100%
24B-91%
SEP 3OCT 28
SEP 3OCT 28
RetentionWeek 1
Returning users
Pending
46.6%986 user-weeks
Related comparisons. Other model pairs to check.
Nearby alternativeQwen3.8 Flash Next vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.8 Flash Next·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructNearby alternativeQwen3.7 Max vs Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructQwen3.7 Max·Dracarys Llama 3.1 70B InstructRelated comparisonQwen3.8 Flash Next vs Jamba MiniQwen3.8 Flash Next·Jamba MiniRelated comparisonQwen3.7 Max vs Jamba MiniQwen3.7 Max·Jamba Mini